Introduce design conventions for controllers and user-facing models.Learn to structure large Ruby on Rails codebases with the tools you already know and love. I won't mention the opinions expressed in this thread about "Stallmanians" (they are out of subject, to say the least), but you're a community and you're making FOSS: you have every rights to expect others to respect your right to use non-free software, but you should at least respect people that think D* shouldn't promote proprietary software in any way.Check out our e-book. Is it really the image of the D* project you want to give to the public and potential future developers ?Įverybody is free to use the software they chose, but "rewarding" people with non-free software won't help build a sense of community about D*, and will only scare some dev away, because they will doubt the values of the community. Even if there's a vote here, what does it mean with only 5 voters ? Remember you do that on behalf of the Diaspora community. Get free licences of a proprietary software in the name of Diaspora, really ? The license is valid for a year at a time and includes software upgrades.Ĭome on, people. Third merged pull request? We can use that as a little incentive to get contributors, do a blog post etc ) And of course we should promote FOSS tools too, not just advertise RubyMine, this has been talked already. If the person is not a 1-day member and you believe they should be rewarded for their work please be sure to pass the key over.Īnyway, any opinions on how we should limit the license keys. We do not have strict guidelines regarding this - I believe each case should be treated personally and mostly according to the common sense. They said initially "core members" but I asked whether we can follow a slightly more relaxed policy and they replied In no circumstance should it be made public, this is against the license conditions. This license is for an unlimited amount of users, but we've been requested to follow good judgement on when to give out the license code. Hey so while ago got a reply from JetBrains and they were happy to give the diaspora* project an open source license for RubyMine. If as part of this agreement Diaspora has to, for example, place a notice on the project website that we are thankful to JetBrains for giving project developers free licences (or, worse, that Diaspora is 'partnering' with JetBrains to develop Diaspora's software), that would be something like endorsement, and that would, I think, need a separate discussion and vote. I don't see how enabling people to use a particular product without having to pay for it is in any way endorsing that product. The Stallman sense is about restriction as much as it is about real freedom. Diaspora is about freedom in the lower-case (non-Stallman) sense: allowing people to do what they want to do in as many ways as possible. Indeed, since the first release, it has been possible to install and run Diaspora on Mac OS, which is completely non-free. I implore the Diaspora project to cease participation in distribution of a nonfree program, and I suggest that those who find that program convenient join in developing a free replacement for it.Ĭould someone point out what is the relevance of Stallman's view to Diaspora? Last time I checked he wasn't involved in the project (and never has been).ĭiaspora has never insisted that only Free Software can be used in anything involving Diaspora's software. What that says to people is, "Freedom is not important." In the long run, it undermines the love of freedom that would motivate why people to contribute to Diaspora. It is direct participation in the distribution of that program. To offer people licenses for a proprietary program is more than just an endorsement. The real issue is not what people can use, it is what the Diaspora project endorses and does. If they want to surrender their freedom by privately running a nonfree program, youĬould not stop them normally you would not even know. People don't need the approval of the Diaspora project for what they use privately. Richard Stallman about this, and i got this response:ĭavid Thompson asserted that it would be a "problem" if you "had to" use only freedom-respecting software to develop Diaspora.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |